<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Аспирантский вестник Поволжья</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2072-2354</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2410-3764</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Samara State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24975</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/2072-2354.2011.0.5-6.176-179</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The choice of approaches to the treatment of patients with open arterial canal</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Выбор подходов к лечению больных с открытым артериальным протоком</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khokhlunov</surname><given-names>M S</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хохлунов</surname><given-names>М С</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Самарский государственный медицинский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-09-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>5-6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO5-6 (2011)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№5-6 (2011)</issue-title><fpage>176</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-03-11"><day>11</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, Khokhlunov M.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Хохлунов М.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khokhlunov M.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хохлунов М.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://aspvestnik.ru/2410-3764/article/view/24975">https://aspvestnik.ru/2410-3764/article/view/24975</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The aim of the study is to assess immediate results of surgical and transcatheter treatment of patients with patent ductus arteriosus and to detect risk factors of development residual shunt after PDA occlusion. 253 consecutive patients were included. Surgery group contained 108 patients and transcatheter group contained 145 patients. There were no death cases in both groups. Residual shunts developed in 19 patients (15.83%) in surgery group and in 2 patients (1.37%) in transcatheter group (р&lt;0,0001). Patients with residual shunts in comparison with those with no residual shunts have significantly larger diameter of pulmonary end of the PDA (р&lt;0,0001). Transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus can be safely and effectively achieved in patients with ductus diameters up to 3.7 mm.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Цель исследования - оценка непосредственных результатов хирургической и эндоваскулярной окклюзии ОАП; выявление факторов риска возникновения резидуальных сбросов по ОАП. В исследование включено 253 пациента. Открытым методом оперировано 108 (1-я группа), рентгенэндоваскулярная окклюзия ОАП была выполнена 145 пациентам (2-я группа). Случаев смерти не было ни в одной из групп. В 1-ой группе из 108 пациентов резидуальный сброс по ОАП наблюдался у 19 (15,83%). Во 2-й группе резидуальный сброс по ОАП выявлен у 1,37% (2 из 145) пациентов, достоверно меньше, чем в 1 группе (р&lt;0,0001). При сравнении пациентов с резидуальным сбросом и без резидуального сброса по ОАП выявлено достоверное различие по диаметру лёгочного конца ОАП (р&lt;0,0001). Выбор метода окклюзии открытого артериального протока зависит от диаметра лёгочного конца ОАП. Если это значение не превышает 3,7 мм, может применяться рентгенэндоваскулярная окклюзия ОАП с риском резидуального сброса по ОАП меньшим, чем при открытой операции.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>patent ductus arteriosus</kwd><kwd>transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus</kwd><kwd>residual shunts after PDA occlusion</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>открытый артериальный проток</kwd><kwd>рентгенэндоваскулярная окклюзия ОАП</kwd><kwd>резидуальный сброс после окклюзии ОАП</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Gross RE, Hubbard JP: Surgical ligation of a PDA; report of first successful case, JAMA 112:729, 1939.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Porstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H: Closure of the persistent ductus arteriosus without thoracotomy, Ger Med Mon 12:259, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Mavrodis C, Backer CL, Gevitz M. Forty-six years of patent ductus arteriosus division at Children`s Memorialo Hospital of Chicago. Ann Surg 1994; 220:402.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Musewe NN, Benson LN, Smallhorn JF, et al: Two-dimensional echocardiographic and color flow Doppler evaluation of ductal occlusion with the Rashkind prosthesis, Circulation 80:1706, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Raaijmaakers B, Nijveld A, van Oort A, et al: Difficulties generated by the small, persistently patent, arterial duct, Cardiol Young 9:392, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Gray DT, Fyler DC, Walker AM, et al: Clinical outcomes and costs of transcatheter as compared with surgical closure of PDA. The PDA Closure Comparative Study Group, N Engl J Med 329:1517, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Sorensen KE, Kristensen B, Hansen OK: Frequency of occurrence of residual ductal flow after surgical ligation by color-flow map- ping, Am J Cardiol 67:653, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Lloyd TR. PDA coil registry. Accessed August 3, 2003. Available at: www.med.umich.edu/pdc/pdacoil/data.htm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Prieto LR, DeCamillo DM, Konrad DJ, et al: Comparison of cost and clinical outcome between transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical closure of isolated PDA, Pediatrics 101:1020, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Goyal VS, Fulwani MC, Ramakantan R, et al: Follow-up after coil closure of PDA, Am J Cardiol 83:463, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Radtke WAK: Comparison of efficacy and safety of the Rashkind occluder vs. Gianturco coils for PDA occlusion. In Proceedings of the Second World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Mt Kisco, NY, 1998, Futura Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Singh TP, Morrow WR, Walters HL, et al: Coil occlusion versus conventional surgical closure of PDA, Am J Cardiol 79:1283, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Shim D, Fedderly RT, Beekman RH III, et al: Follow-up of coil occlusion of PDA, J Am Coll Cardiol 28:207, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Uzun O, Dickinson D, Parsons J, et al: Residual and recurrent shunts after implantation of Cook detachable duct occlusion coils, Heart 79:220, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Musewe NN, Benson LN, Smallhorn JF, et al: Two-dimensional echocardiographic and color flow Doppler evaluation of ductal occlusion with the Rashkind prosthesis, Circulation 80:1706, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Raaijmaakers B, Nijveld A, van Oort A, et al: Difficulties generated by the small, persistently patent, arterial duct, Cardiol Young 9:392, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Gray DT, Fyler DC, Walker AM, et al: Clinical outcomes and costs of transcatheter as compared with surgical closure of PDA. The PDA Closure Comparative Study Group, N Engl J Med 329:1517, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Sorensen KE, Kristensen B, Hansen OK: Frequency of occurrence of residual ductal flow after surgical ligation by color-flow map- ping, Am J Cardiol 67:653, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
